Transportation Hierarchy DUDE

I GOT HIT BY A CAR!

HE SLAMMED RIGHT INTO MY BIKE AND KNOCKED ME OFF AND BENT MY WHEEL IN HALF.

I landed on my ASS and my COMPUTER hit the GROUND.

This makes me think to myself: in the scheme of transportation, does bigger mean better? Just because cars are more expensive and use EVIL OIL and can carry a bunch of screaming brats around, does it mean that the city should spend WAY MUCH MORE MONEY on the roads and LIKE ZERO MONEY ON BIKING AIDS. Why not have elevated bike paths around the city? Its no fair when we bikes have to try to throw down with BILLIONS OF TONS OF STEEL MOVING AT VELOCITIES MANY TIMES GREATER THAN OUR OWN. When a bike goes up against a car, there really is no contest, THE CAR ALWAYS WINS. The other alternative to "sky paths" is to put some sort of controllable explosive at the disposal of bikes so cars learn to fear them and give them the same respect that bikes give cars.

My last word of advice to the cars is this "YOU BETTER WATCH OUT FOR ME NEXT TIME BECAUSE I AM GOING TO COME AFTER YOU AND DESTROY YOU".

ROCKY DOESN'T TAKE SH*T FOR AN ANSWER
PEACE.